Author: John Merlino
Date: 15:13:57 09/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2000 at 17:54:36, Jason Williamson wrote: >On September 07, 2000 at 17:23:46, John Merlino wrote: > >>On September 07, 2000 at 17:19:02, James wrote: >> >>>Can live with that. Actually, the 6000 editor i found somewhat better for >>>improveds range of vision than the 5500, but did not try the 7000, presumed it >>>to be the same. at least my books transfered to each version, and back. Maybe >>>have been asking questions the wrong places. You have prvided more than all of >>>the calls and emails tried over the years to/about CM, is greatly >>>appreciated.As the most successful net user of CM, I still use it rather than >>>the stronger programs because it is just more fun, with all of its twists and >>>tweaks. We can never be completely satisfied < who can> but always looking for >>>improvement :). yours... OzsO >> >>The editor for CM7000 is significantly different than for previous versions. It >>uses a large tree of moves similar to the key moves in the database interface. >>The file format for the books, however, has not changed since CM5000. >> >>Thanks for the compliments, >> >>jm > >What about some sort of PGN file processing ability to create a large book out >of a large PGN? > >JW There is such a thing (and there was in CM7000) as well. BUT, as Daniel pointed out, the MOVES were imported but not the FREQUENCY of the moves. Hopefully, this will be fixed in CM8000. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.