Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 15:29:00 09/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2000 at 17:02:26, Dann Corbit wrote: >I think your work is interesting. I think your analysis is interesting. I >think your occasional claims to having invented something seem overblown to me. >But I am not an expert. Well the nice part is that many times my text also get used for the games I anelyzed before they did get played by Kramnik and Kasparov For instance in the chessbase magazine where this game was published had some text wich was not of the curent time like they had to make a new program to find material in position (I only had to change from program to do this i am not sure if it was from tascbase to Rebel or the otherway around) also they said that that the file was 460kb big I think at the curent time (because I think the game is now implented in there database I am the only person in the world wich format that was I also now that Qf7 was bad d5 instead was winning (but no program found that in the time I made this anelyze and it took me quite some time to figure out if the white pawns could be stopped yes or no. That I claim to be the inventer almost must be treu cause my anelyzes are always a combination of computer and human techniques so difecult to find for a human But then again you can be darn sure that the anelyzes givven with the games I claimed to have anelyzed are corect (in this way I also refind old anelyzes from me wich I have lost for instance Kramnik Junior6 included my text If you like I can give a list of them
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.