Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 16:36:46 09/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2000 at 18:29:00, Marc van Hal wrote: >On September 07, 2000 at 17:02:26, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>I think your work is interesting. I think your analysis is interesting. I >>think your occasional claims to having invented something seem overblown to me. >>But I am not an expert. >Well the nice part is that many times my text also get used for the games I >anelyzed before they did get played by Kramnik and Kasparov >For instance in the chessbase magazine where this game was published had some >text wich was not of the curent time >like they had to make a new program to find material in position (I only had to >change from program to do this i am not sure if it was from tascbase to Rebel or >the otherway around) >also they said that that the file was 460kb big >I think at the curent time (because I think the game is now implented in there >database >I am the only person in the world wich format that was >I also now that Qf7 was bad d5 instead was winning (but no program found that in >the time I made this anelyze and it took me quite some time to figure out if the >white pawns could be stopped yes or no. >That I claim to be the inventer almost must be treu cause my anelyzes are always >a combination of computer and human techniques so difecult to find for a human >But then again you can be darn sure that the anelyzes givven with the games I >claimed to have anelyzed are corect (in this way I also refind old anelyzes from >me wich I have lost for instance Kramnik Junior6 included my text >If you like I can give a list of them I would love to see a complete list with comments. If it is too large to post here, perhaps you could send me an email.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.