Author: José Carlos
Date: 06:43:50 09/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2000 at 16:23:49, Marc van Hal wrote: >How do I have to see my work >Some people here said the said something and later on had to take there words >back >I have never come in such a position >But if there is something seriouly wrong with it I am sure you should have >written about it >Lets face it this site is highly critical. (Me included) >But actualy my question is in wich kind of catogery you think I belong in >acording to anelyzes and give an example >a)bad >B)average >c)great >d)super >e)Extreem > >It is because indeed I think I am verry good in this why I made all my postings >To contribute something of importance to chess and not to my ego (ok also to my >ego but not on the first place) >If it is so many people say I am not verry good in what I do I won't post here >any more cause then it only takes webpage room >like some other people do here ( I won't metion any names but ok) I'm not very good in chess programming. I'm just an amateur. But that does not mean I can't post here. I can _and I must_ because I've learnt a lot of things here from more experienced programmers, so when someone asks something I can answer (or at least, I have an opinion about), I must answer and put it in common with the rest of the people here. If it's worthless, nothing bad happens. Furthermore, there are a lot of threads here in wich you don't need to be an expert to post, because they speak of general things. Thus, there is no point in stop posting regardless your ability in a given knowledge field. I think the most important here is _respect_. If we respect each other, everyone can post what (s)he wants (related to chess and computers). >For those who came up to build a webpage I am already busy with that for a long >time but every time stop (when it comes to my mind Why should I build a webpage >ffor my self ? or are there enough people intrested) If you are only going to do something if you are completely sure it will succeed, you will do very few things... Do that web page, and then work on it for making it interesting for people. >The reason also why I am depressed that instead of becoming an einselganger I >would find someone to cooperate with (I tried to this with James Robertson I did >send him the database of many of my anelyzes and kept hin up to date with new >ones or refound ones You are not the only one that have had a bad experience with a chess programmer, as a beta tester. Don't worry about that. >And start anelyzing many other games (in that time he told me that he had found >someone to generate a book with) >Maybe in the near future someone could help me with some plans to create on my >webpage > >But all the sudden didn't here anything anymore from him >And then seeing they prefer someone who is not highly enough qualefied for the >work instead. Averno is freely available. I'd be very happy to receive your opinions that could help me improve it. Any suggestion? >Also what I wrote about the fact the I some times have to laugh that computer >programs get beaten by anelyzes from me by a GM is not only laugh but actualy >laughing like a farmer with a thoothegg (Dutch verb) > (I rather would have seen these anelyzes in the openings books from these >computer programs instead) > >And indeed Mogens I am extremely disapointed I was neglacted by Schroder BV >cause I see to many people becomming a betta tester who never contributed >something of importance and later asume they are some great personelety because >the fact they are betatesters. >And again not for myself in the first place but for the sake of the program >(where Rebel 10 came closer to be a great program Rebel Century did fail >Also this is Why I prefer Junior6 most to make my anelyzes now best of it is the >learning methode) > >At last Come won't go to heaven because for sure he is betting on the wrong >gods. > >Maybe some peopel again will think I blow to high from the tower but this is to >point out my ideas athoughts better >Marc van Hal Ok, I'm ready to hear your ideas. I cannot pay for it, but I'll listen to you and, hopefuly, will improve Averno for CCT-2 ;) José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.