Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: How many of the 300 WAC positions are mates in n?

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 08:09:25 09/08/00

Go up one level in this thread

On September 08, 2000 at 07:39:34, Jari Huikari wrote:

Why not move your ass and start testing position by position from
the WAC. Note that 213 is mate in 18 but some progs don't find it.

After testing those 299 positions you'll get a good idea how tough it
is gonna be to find a mate score for the root.

>Perhaps even the initial position of chess is mate in n for white with some
>very big n ... :-) So it'd be better to ask:
>
>How many mate in n they have found from 300 Win At Chess positions?
>
>					Jari

• Re: How many of the 300 WAC positions are mates in n? Jari Huikari 08:26:02 09/08/00
  • Re: How many of the 300 WAC positions are mates in n? Vincent Diepeveen 08:51:23 09/08/00
    • Re: How many of the 300 WAC positions are mates in n? James T. Walker 09:06:37 09/09/00
      • We know. :-) Jari Huikari 09:26:53 09/09/00
        • Re: I know you know :-) James T. Walker 16:38:20 09/09/00
    • Re: How many of the 300 WAC positions are mates in n? Jari Huikari 06:23:48 09/09/00
    • Re: How many of the 300 WAC positions are mates in n? Robin Smith 18:00:49 09/08/00
      • Re: How many of the 300 WAC positions are mates in n? Vincent Diepeveen 08:17:49 09/09/00
        • Re: How many of the 300 WAC positions are mates in n? Robin Smith 20:36:16 09/10/00
        • Well, How many of the 300 WAC positions are mates in 10 or less moves? Jari Huikari 09:16:10 09/09/00

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.