Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A New CCC Poll Question At Last!!!

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 09:19:13 09/08/00

Go up one level in this thread


On September 08, 2000 at 10:43:16, Peter Davison wrote:

>On September 08, 2000 at 09:21:07, Mogens Larsen wrote:
>
>>On September 08, 2000 at 08:08:24, Peter Davison wrote:
>>
>>>Who is "we"?
>>
>>Maybe all those who are not you?
>>
>>Mogens.
>
>Yes. Exactly so. And what can I deduce from your piece of absolute honesty?
>
>That "we", "you", "me", "who" is far more important here than any idea.
>
>In a forum, ideas are what count. Ideas are tossed around. The unwritten rules
>are that an idea is not responsible for the people that believe in it, an idea
>is not owned, an idea does not connect to the ego of its originator, the
>mouthpiece for an idea doesn't feel personally bad if the idea is somehow
>disproven.
>
>A club, on the other hand, is a place for relationships. Members enter clubs,
>make friends, find someone to send them emails, get less lonely, supposedly
>cooperate, although here the usual procedure is to provoke random personal
>zero-sum games as you yourself have shown recently with Villegas and Silver,
>presumably through boredom?
>
>Originally, this place was set up to be an ideas forum. An ideas forum attracts
>intellectuals, people with ideas. The "who" of it was supposedly irrelevant, one
>of the favourite expressions was "ad hominem".

This forum was setup for people to talk about computer chess in its
widest form not limited to new ideas only.


>Now the "who" is supremely important. Ad hominem rules. Does it not? And the few
>guys with ideas and the courage to propound them? Gone. Every one.

Who is every one?

I remember Chris W. left. Pity.


>Apart from observing the sillyness, and there is a limit from what one can learn
>from watching soap opera repeats, there is nothing of interest here. The limited
>computer chess stuff could be on a FAQ. The kindergarden programmer group might
>as well be on an email list, or else refer to the non-existent FAQ or published
>sources. Is there any other benefit that couldn't be served by a chat room for
>the sad and lonely?

Pity you dislike this forum.

Ed


>So long.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.