Author: Jari Huikari
Date: 06:23:48 09/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 2000 at 11:51:23, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On September 08, 2000 at 11:26:02, Jari Huikari wrote: > >>On September 08, 2000 at 11:09:25, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>Why not move your ass and start testing position by position from >>>the WAC. >> >>I have run some tests with my slow machine and slow program. Would be nice >>to compare the results with those of some good program with faster hardware. >So instead of a run of 2 million lightyears on your computer you >think if we do it in a lightyear less that we qualify more to solve >the openingsposition? I am not going to solve the openingsposition. (I shouldn't have mentioned it at all.) It's enough for me to know how many of those 300 positions are meant to be mate in n. Nero finds 50 in quite reasonable time. (Not the mate in 18) Jari
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.