Author: Michel Langeveld
Date: 07:31:22 09/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 2000 at 19:01:01, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 08, 2000 at 15:44:34, Michel Langeveld wrote: > >>Origanal CAP row: >>8/8/2R5/1p2qp1k/1P2r3/2PQ2P1/5K2/8 w - - acd 13; acn 149063037; ce 1458; pv Qd1+ >>Kg5 Qd2+ Rf4+ Kg1 Kh5 Qh2+ Kg5 gxf4+ Qxf4 Rg6+ Kxg6 Qxf4 Kf7 c4 bxc4 b5 Kf6 b6 >>c3 b7 c2 b8=Q Ke6; pm Qd1+; bm Qd1+; id "WAC.058"; >> >>New CAP row (seems to be mate in: 32) > > >> >> b8=Q Kf7 11. Qc7+ <HT> >> 14 5:38 ++ 1. Qd1+!! >> 14 13:52 Mat32 1. Qd1+ Kg5 2. Qd2+ Rf4+ 3. Qxf4+ Qxf4+ >> 4. gxf4+ Kxf4 5. Rc5 Ke4 6. Rxf5 Kxf5 >> <HT> >> 14-> 17:15 Mat32 1. Qd1+ Kg5 2. Qd2+ Rf4+ 3. Qxf4+ Qxf4+ >> 4. gxf4+ Kxf4 5. Rc5 Ke4 6. Rxf5 Kxf5 >> <HT> > >It seems to be mate in less than 32 but tablebases confuse the computer and it >goes for sacrifices that are not the shortest mate. > >White does not need KPP vs KP endgame to mate and 6.Rxf5 in the line of mate in >32 is clearly not the best move(6.Rxb5 is better). > >Uri Well I have analyzed a long time and it's turned to in a mate-in-15 8/8/2R5/1p2qp1k/1P2r3/2PQ2P1/5K2/8 w - - acd 17; acn -1; acs 17644; ce 32738; pv Qd1+ Kg5 Qd2+ Rf4+ Qxf4+ Qxf4+ gxf4+ Kxf4 c4 bxc4 Rxc4+;
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.