Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: How many of the 300 WAC positions are mates in n?

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 08:17:49 09/09/00

Go up one level in this thread


On September 08, 2000 at 21:00:49, Robin Smith wrote:

>On September 08, 2000 at 11:51:23, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>>On September 08, 2000 at 11:26:02, Jari Huikari wrote:
>>
>>>On September 08, 2000 at 11:09:25, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>>
>>>>Why not move your ass and start testing position by position from
>>>>the WAC.
>>>
>>>I have run some tests with my slow machine and slow program. Would be nice
>>>to compare the results with those of some good program with faster hardware.
>>>
>>>					Jari
>>
>>So instead of a run of 2 million lightyears on your computer you
>>think if we do it in a lightyear less that we qualify more to solve
>>the openingsposition?

>How will transporting the computer approximately 1.88 x 10^19 kilometers
>accomplish anything?

It will accomplish the same as the plan to solve the openingsposition
with nowadays hardware will.

Some cries from excitement from those who don't understand the uselessness
of it, some others getting excited because it goes a long way...




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.