Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:46:03 09/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 11, 2000 at 04:26:43, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On September 10, 2000 at 21:52:20, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>Oh I agree fully. I just expected Gandalf to do a bit better. Close series, and >>still good results... I also agree Crafty is not a weak program, that was not my >>intention to be relayed. I was just surprised by the result. >> >>But in any case, Gandalf does have problems with Crafty, and Fritz 6. It handles >>everything else pretty reasonably. > >There was nothing wrong with what you wrote and I agree with your previous >assessment and also regarding Fritz 6. Your message just happened to be the last >in the thread at the time and the temptation to take a swing at the "Crafty >excuse company" proved too overpowering. > >The latest Nalimov build of Crafty 17.13 seems vicious and mean, so I doubt that >only Gandalf will suffer when confronted with its strength. Can you explain what is the big change between 17.13 and 17.11 I saw almost no change in the results. The results were: Gandalf432_f-Crafty17.11 7.5-6.5. Gandalf_432f-Crafty17.13 12-12 I do not see indication that the latest nalimov build made a big difference based on the results so I do not understand the vicious and mean remark. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.