Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Thank you for the info, Peter. Appreciated. (NT)

Author: Peter Skinner

Date: 07:17:49 09/11/00

Go up one level in this thread

On September 11, 2000 at 10:12:33, Mogens Larsen wrote:

>Kein text. Bitte nicht lesen.

On a side note, I feel that Gandalf 4.32e was the better version. It seemed to
handle odd book lines better. And it seemed to use it's time better. Those are
just my personal views.

• Re: Thank you for the info, Peter. Appreciated. (NT) Uri Blass 08:03:34 09/11/00
  • Re: Thank you for the info, Peter. Appreciated. (NT) James Robertson 19:21:15 09/12/00
  • Re: Thank you for the info, Peter. Appreciated. (NT) James Robertson 19:21:02 09/12/00
  • Re: Thank you for the info, Peter. Appreciated. (NT) Christian Koch 00:48:23 09/12/00
    • Re: Thank you for the info, Peter. Appreciated. (NT) Peter Skinner 22:41:45 09/12/00
  • Re: Thank you for the info, Peter. Appreciated. (NT) Chessfun 11:20:33 09/11/00
    • Re: Thank you for the info, Peter. Appreciated. (NT) Mogens Larsen 11:59:52 09/11/00
      • Re: Thank you for the info, Peter. Appreciated. (NT) Uri Blass 13:52:35 09/11/00
        • Re: Thank you for the info, Peter. Appreciated. (NT) Mogens Larsen 14:23:35 09/11/00
          • Re: Thank you for the info, Peter. Appreciated. (NT) Uri Blass 15:04:07 09/11/00
  • Re: Thank you for the info, Peter. Appreciated. (NT) Albert Silver 10:37:46 09/11/00
    • Re: Thank you for the info, Peter. Appreciated. (NT) Chessfun 11:22:50 09/11/00
    • Re: Thank you for the info, Peter. Appreciated. (NT) Uri Blass 10:48:22 09/11/00
• Re: Thank you for the info, Peter. Appreciated. Mogens Larsen 07:33:28 09/11/00

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.