Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Thank you for the info, Peter. Appreciated. (NT)

Author: Christian Koch

Date: 00:48:23 09/12/00

Go up one level in this thread


Hi,

on my computer Gandalf needs 607 sec. to find Bg3.

11 9 60790 91754124  Bg3 Qxh5 Kh1 a4 f3 h6 Ne4 Qg6 Rfe1 Rfc8

best regards,
Christian

On September 11, 2000 at 11:03:34, Uri Blass wrote:

>On September 11, 2000 at 10:17:49, Peter Skinner wrote:
>
>>On September 11, 2000 at 10:12:33, Mogens Larsen wrote:
>>
>>>Kein text. Bitte nicht lesen.
>>
>>On a side note, I feel that Gandalf 4.32e was the better version. It seemed to
>>handle odd book lines better. And it seemed to use it's time better. Those are
>>just my personal views.
>
>Unfortunately there is no information from the games that were posted about time
>and evaluations of Gandalf so it is impossible for me to know.
>
>Here is one blunder of Gandalf4.32f against Crafty
>
>[D]r4rk1/3p1ppp/1pb1p3/p1b1P2B/2P2B1q/P1N5/1PQ2PPP/3R1RK1 w - - 0 1
>
>We have no information how much time did Gandalf use to play 16.g4 instead of
>16.Bg3.
>
>We have no information if using more time could practically help it to find a
>better move.
>Gandalf lost the game after 16.g4?? Qh3 17.Nd5 exd5 18.Rd3 Qh4 19.Qd2?(again Bg3
>was probably better) dxc4 20.Bg5 Qxg5 21.Qxg5 cxd3 when black has a winning
>position.
>
>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.