Author: Jason Williamson
Date: 14:51:16 09/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2000 at 16:17:01, Dann Corbit wrote: >On September 12, 2000 at 15:41:29, Eddie wrote: >[snip] >>Thx Dann, >> >>LGoliath winning the Four Crowns Division? Is that vers. 29a ? > >Crafty v17.11 (Eugene Nalimov compiled) >Little Goliath Gold Version 2.8 > >>I'm just >>wondering here, cuz Crafty rules over LG here when I match them up ... > >Crafty has not even played against LG yet. Here are the individual crosstables >for those two programs: > >(1) LGoliath : 24 (+ 14,= 9,- 1), 77.1 % > >Bringer : 4 (+ 1,= 2,- 1), 50.0 % >Francesca : 4 (+ 3,= 1,- 0), 87.5 % >SOS : 4 (+ 3,= 1,- 0), 87.5 % >Yace : 4 (+ 3,= 1,- 0), 87.5 % >ZChess : 4 (+ 4,= 0,- 0), 100.0 % >Comet : 4 (+ 0,= 4,- 0), 50.0 % > > >(2) Crafty : 24 (+ 10,= 10,- 4), 62.5 % > >Amy : 4 (+ 0,= 2,- 2), 25.0 % >Gromit2 : 4 (+ 2,= 2,- 0), 75.0 % >TCBishop : 4 (+ 2,= 2,- 0), 75.0 % >Bringer : 4 (+ 2,= 1,- 1), 62.5 % >SOS : 4 (+ 3,= 1,- 0), 87.5 % >Comet : 4 (+ 1,= 2,- 1), 50.0 % > >>seriously Crafty has no problems with LG on my system .... anyway thanks a lot, >>just a bit confused as to these results! :)) Take care .... > >LG 2.8 at long time controls looks very, very strong so far. As you will notice >from my original posting, the ELO error is still huge. We are only 1/2 way done >with the 4 crown division, so there could still be large shake-ups in the final >standings from what we see now. > >In a single 4 game match, you can see some very strange results. Look how Amy >handed crafty its hat. But if I ran one hundred games, I strongly suspect we >would see a different result between those two engines. What version of Yace are you using? 0.22?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.