Author: James Robertson
Date: 19:21:15 09/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 11, 2000 at 11:03:34, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 11, 2000 at 10:17:49, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On September 11, 2000 at 10:12:33, Mogens Larsen wrote: >> >>>Kein text. Bitte nicht lesen. >> >>On a side note, I feel that Gandalf 4.32e was the better version. It seemed to >>handle odd book lines better. And it seemed to use it's time better. Those are >>just my personal views. > >Unfortunately there is no information from the games that were posted about time >and evaluations of Gandalf so it is impossible for me to know. > >Here is one blunder of Gandalf4.32f against Crafty > >[D]r4rk1/3p1ppp/1pb1p3/p1b1P2B/2P2B1q/P1N5/1PQ2PPP/3R1RK1 w - - 0 1 > >We have no information how much time did Gandalf use to play 16.g4 instead of >16.Bg3. Insomniac picks Bg3 for good after 22 seconds on my P933. The score is .51. James > >We have no information if using more time could practically help it to find a >better move. >Gandalf lost the game after 16.g4?? Qh3 17.Nd5 exd5 18.Rd3 Qh4 19.Qd2?(again Bg3 >was probably better) dxc4 20.Bg5 Qxg5 21.Qxg5 cxd3 when black has a winning >position. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.