Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 06:56:16 09/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 14, 2000 at 07:32:08, paul bedrey wrote: >On September 14, 2000 at 06:49:12, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >>On September 14, 2000 at 01:19:01, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>> >>Yes, it could be neither of these but SOS instead. >>Uli > >I can see from the SSDF tests that the chessbase version of SOS is much stronger >than the winboard engine, the question is why? Is it a matter of a version >compatable with the GUI or improvements in the engine? Do you know if the >Chessbase conversion of your Comet is similar to what they've done for SOS or >could it too become stronger when made completely compatible? I think that the engine is pretty much the same, no matter of you talk about the winboard or chessbase platform. It's just a different interface to the user. I guess that it's just a newer version of the SOS CB engines compared to the latest winboard engine - probably no dramatic changes. But I don't really know. Uli > >I've been running a series of 20 game matches between the top ten winboard >programs(in winboard interface) and after 180 games Comet and Sos are in a tie >for 3rd place.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.