Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 15:40:37 09/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 14, 2000 at 14:42:28, Dan Ellwein wrote: >On September 14, 2000 at 14:39:37, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On September 14, 2000 at 14:36:41, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On September 14, 2000 at 14:33:49, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>On September 14, 2000 at 14:30:07, Dan Ellwein wrote: >>>>[SNIP] >>>>>I guess it would be impractical to run this test with opening book disabled... >>>>> >>>>>(startin' with the very first move have the computer think on its own)... >>>>> >>>>>but i wonder what the data would look like if you did... >>>>> >>>>>it may be that there would not be a cut-off at iteration 19... >>>> >>>>My guess is that in the first ten moves no program on earth can get to ply 19 >>>>unless it does a ludicrous amount of speculative pruning. Even 16 plies would >>>>be formidable. >>> >>> >>>We are close. >>> >>> >>> Christophe >> >> >>DB was "there" in 1997. >> >>:) > >Bob > >What would it take to get Deep Blue up and running and give us some data >comparable to what Ed has done here... Several million dollars, an act of congress, and divine intervention, I am afraid. The several million dollars part is the _easiest_ of the required events. :) We do have some data for 6 games vs Kasparov. Someone could hand-compute the above for DB using that data, and get a rough approximation of what kind of 'change expectancy' it had for each additional ply.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.