Author: walter irvin
Date: 20:49:52 09/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 14, 2000 at 09:56:16, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >On September 14, 2000 at 07:32:08, paul bedrey wrote: > >>On September 14, 2000 at 06:49:12, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >> >>>On September 14, 2000 at 01:19:01, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>> >>>Yes, it could be neither of these but SOS instead. >>>Uli >> >>I can see from the SSDF tests that the chessbase version of SOS is much stronger >>than the winboard engine, the question is why? Is it a matter of a version >>compatable with the GUI or improvements in the engine? Do you know if the >>Chessbase conversion of your Comet is similar to what they've done for SOS or >>could it too become stronger when made completely compatible? > >I think that the engine is pretty much the same, no matter of you talk about the >winboard or chessbase platform. It's just a different interface to the user. > >I guess that it's just a newer version of the SOS CB engines compared to the >latest winboard engine - probably no dramatic changes. But I don't really know. the Comet i think it is b20 has really shown to be very strong getting dangerously close to fritz6 and hiarcs 7.32 in elo .if comet improves at this rate it could end up being the top program .if this happens will comet still be freeware??? . > >Uli >> >>I've been running a series of 20 game matches between the top ten winboard >>programs(in winboard interface) and after 180 games Comet and Sos are in a tie >>for 3rd place.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.