Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 07:55:57 09/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 2000 at 08:55:17, Oliver Roese wrote: > >>1.Rxe6 N5f6 2.Re2 a6 3.Bd3 0-0 >> ² (0.61) depth: 12/20 00:00:08 198kN >>1.Rxe6 Rc7 2.Re1 0-0 3.Bh6 Re8 4.Rac1 Rxc1 5.Bxc1 N5f6 6.Bc6 >> ² (0.48) depth: 13/22 00:00:15 394kN >>1.Rxe6 Rc7 2.Re4 a6 3.Be2 0-0 4.Bh6 N7f6 >> ² (0.45) depth: 14/22 00:00:26 634kN >>1.Rxe6 Rc7 2.Re2 a6 3.Bxd7+ Qxd7 4.Qxd7+ Rxd7 5.Nc5 Rc7 >> ² (0.45) depth: 15/23 00:00:45 1025kN >>1.Rxe6 Rc7 2.Re1 a6 3.Bd3 0-0 4.Bh6 Re8 >> ² (0.43) depth: 16/24 00:01:15 1648kN >>1.Rxe6 Rc7 2.Re2 a6 3.Bd3 0-0 4.Bh6 Re8 >> ² (0.42) depth: 17/25 00:02:34 3487kN >> > > >Sorry but there are serious doubts about the merits of 1.Rxe6. >This position was posted by Ed Schröder some months ago. It is a kind of >computertrap. Just dirigate your chessengine to the position above and wait. >I analyzed this position some time ago and my last personally impression was, >that 1.Rxe6 is incorrect. Quite possibly so. The analysis I posted is not so accurate as it seems. See the discussion with Dann Corbit for an explanation why... -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.