Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Thanks for not posting the solution

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 10:59:14 09/17/00

Go up one level in this thread


On September 17, 2000 at 13:53:18, Uri Blass wrote:

>On September 17, 2000 at 13:02:01, Ed Schröder wrote:
>
>>On September 17, 2000 at 12:28:42, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On September 17, 2000 at 12:05:40, Paulo Soares wrote:
>>>
>>>>On September 17, 2000 at 06:53:48, Frederic Friedel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Many thanks Ricardo and Uri for NOT posting the solution.
>>>>
>>>>I am curious, because you thanked to Ricardo and Uri for not posted the
>>>>solution?
>>>>
>>>>Paulo Soares, from Brazil
>>>
>>>I understood that he wanted people to think about the solution.
>>>In the case of myself I know the solution.
>>
>>I think the white king has to go to a7 to ensure the draw?
>>
>>Ed
>
>This is not the solution.
>The solution is in page 108 of the book:
>
>Endgame Virtuosity(A selection of 222 Israeli Chess studies).
>
>This is one of the books that I got as a prize for winning some of the israeli
>study competitions when the target was to compose long studies when the idea of
>the final position was known(for example in one of the competitions the rules
>said that the final move must be mate for white when white has only 2 pieces
>when one of them is a knight or a bishop or a pawn.
>
>The studies had to be good studies.
>This means that white has always one move to win in the main line(or to draw if
>this is the target).
>I do not remember the exact rules now but there was a rule that the first move
>cannot be a capture(or at least not a capture of more than a pawn).
>
>My studies had not artistic value so they cannot win other competitions(there
>were many captures but the first move was not a capture according to the rules).
>
>I used Genius3 to help me to compose the studies at that time when I always
>checked the next best move.
>I always tried for many hours to prove that my studies are not correct and I
>decided to believe that my studies are correct only after a failure to prove
>that they are not correct.
>I also tried to add moves backward with keeping the correctness of the studies.
>Genius3 helped me to outsearch my opponents who did not use a computer in seeing
>backward and I probably could not win the competitions without it.
>
>I won 4 books because 4 of my studies won first or second place.
>I found that the judge did not check the studies with a computer to check for
>errors and there were studies of other composers with errors.
>
>It is also not easy to know if a study is correct.
>
>This reason convinced me not to try to compose the 5th study and after 5
>tournaments a new editor came and decided to stop these tournaments.
>
>
>Uri

Can you post your studies?

Ed



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.