Author: James
Date: 10:39:05 09/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 21, 2000 at 01:14:45, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 20, 2000 at 19:50:57, James wrote: > >>. If tt=27 is the best you cn set, please let me know what you see, and i will >>retest cm55 at the same tt setting, cm600o unreliable unless 2 ini files are set >>the same, do not know about cm8000, but would love to try the beta myself :) > >I did not try more than tt=27 because I thought that it is impossible. > >My logic said that if my computer has 256 mbytes then I cannot use tt=28 because >I cannot use 256 mbytes for hash so the maximal hash tables that I can use is >128 mbytes. > >By the same logic the maximal hash that you can use is 256 mbytes(you have 512 >ram) so tt=28 should be maximal for you. > >Uri .. What can i say, except facts beat theory? Indeed, with the same ram,on my 550 i could not set 30 without locking up, but, with the 733, do not lock up til ttables=31. test your system, and remember, that 2 to the 20th does not equal 1 meg, nor is 256 meg really 256 meg :) > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.