Author: John Merlino
Date: 13:35:08 09/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 21, 2000 at 16:08:48, Uri Blass wrote: >I can add that the result of chessmaster8000 seems to be better than >chessmaster6000 in finding the shortest mate but worse in finding a >mate(chessmaster6000 found a mate in 20 in less than 20 minutes on pIII450). > >Chessmaster6000 needed more hours to see the mate in 13 and it could see it only >at depth 6/16 > >I cannot know the exact time because chessmaster6000 does not show the time in >hours but only the number of minutes(for example if the time is 3:42:27 it is >going to show only 42:27) > >I hope that this bug will be fixed in chessmaster8000 > >Uri That bug was fixed in Chessmaster 7000. One other note is that Chessmaster 8000 does not report X/Y in the depth anymore (at least, not in my Beta version). It reports like most other engines, giving a single number for the depth. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.