Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:52:34 12/16/97
Go up one level in this thread
On December 16, 1997 at 09:20:29, Albert Silver wrote: >On December 16, 1997 at 05:07:08, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>> >>>Thoralf reported that after removing the Rebel-Rebel matches in >>>question R9-200MMX would go down 15 points and the R9-P90 would go >>>up 17 points. >>> >>Heh, heh! Correction is now not so important, when it actually LOWERS >>R9 200 MMX rating. IMHO games with wrong book should immediately >>removed. >> >>But so after one year work Rebel team hasn't beaten amateur (Hiarcs6 >>team)! > >Agreed, but Ed correctly pointed out that one also doesn't know what the >result would have been had they played against each other with the >proper books. For my part, I find both programs to be extremely >impressive. I have a few tests of my own, and one of them consists of a >proposed rook exchange that would lead to a won pawn endgame. Rebel and >Hiarcs are the only programs (not using any endgame tablebase) that go >for the exchange AND see that it is completely won BEFORE actually >making the exchange. Frankly it's hard to say which is better as they do >play somewhat differently. If you don't mind and have time, please post it. We need more of this type of position...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.