Author: James
Date: 14:22:44 09/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 21, 2000 at 16:35:08, John Merlino wrote: >On September 21, 2000 at 16:08:48, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I can add that the result of chessmaster8000 seems to be better than >>chessmaster6000 in finding the shortest mate but worse in finding a >>mate(chessmaster6000 found a mate in 20 in less than 20 minutes on pIII450). >> >>Chessmaster6000 needed more hours to see the mate in 13 and it could see it only >>at depth 6/16 >> >>I cannot know the exact time because chessmaster6000 does not show the time in >>hours but only the number of minutes(for example if the time is 3:42:27 it is >>going to show only 42:27) >> >>I hope that this bug will be fixed in chessmaster8000 >> >>Uri >Interesting, stuff.. could it be suggested that once mate is sen, the number of moves be displayed, while still crunching, and when a shorter mate is found that would be then displayed? currently the mate length is not shown until the move is made, .... thx >That bug was fixed in Chessmaster 7000. One other note is that Chessmaster 8000 >does not report X/Y in the depth anymore (at least, not in my Beta version). It >reports like most other engines, giving a single number for the depth. > >jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.