Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 16:33:41 09/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 21, 2000 at 19:05:05, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On September 21, 2000 at 15:08:50, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>Hello! >> >>The another (new) Settings here are in "*" ! >> >>[NimzoWerkstatt/WinBoard-Nimzo2000b] >>HashMemKB=90112 >>StdBookName=modern.nbk (standard.nbk) >>CheCodeName=c:\programme\Genius65\engines\wbnimzo2000b\WbNimzo2000b.cmp >>PwnThreatFlg=1 >>MultiCutCnt=2 >>BishopPair=50 >>MidGameMob=32 >>EndGameMob=10 >>Opponent=1 >>PcThreat=1 >>FewMvsThreat=1 * (standard = 0) >>FutilCutoff=1 >>FutilStrCutoff=1 * (standard = 0) >>RandomBook=0 >>LearnFlg=0 >>PEval=6 >>KSafty=8 >>PVal=105 >>NVal=425 >>BVal=435 * (standard = 425) >>RVal=685 >>QVal=1240 >>AskHashSz=0 >> >>I tested the GS2930-Test from H.J. Schumacher and Dr. Gourevitch with this >>Options on P600E and 88 MB Hash under Genius 6.5 (MCS): >> >>1.) 0:37 Min./ >>2.) -- >>3.) 1:48 Min./deep 15 >>4.) 12:09 Min./deep 12 >>5.) 18:47 Min./deep 12 >>6.) -- >>7.) 16:49 Min./deep 14 >>8.) 1:09 Min/deep 10 >>9.) 0:50 Min./deep 13 >>10.) 6:13 Min/deep 11 ( 20:56 Min. Qe3 :) >>11.) 17:24 Min./deep 15 >>12.) -- >>13.) -- >>14.) 2:19 Min./deep 12 >> >>I think, the another (new) Settings are allways very good ! > >What about the default settings? What's the difference in testresults? > >Mogens. Hello! See default settings by parameters now! See 2 positions from my last posting for ChessFunn. In the test BS2830 are my settings better, and in tactical positions. And in GS2930-Test is this a very good resultat, 10 positions here find is the Best from all programms. reagards, Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.