Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 17:38:14 09/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 21, 2000 at 16:56:48, Chessfun wrote: >On September 20, 2000 at 17:53:16, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On September 19, 2000 at 10:16:19, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>>This has very little to do with how "strong" an engine is compared to others. >>>It only means it solves _this_ problem set faster. >> >>Exactly, DIEP sacraficed a piece against Gandalf in german championship. >>Diep was +2.xx already when gandalf still was happy for black. > > >This has very little to do with how "strong" an engine is compared to others. >It only means it solves _this_ problem faster. > >Thanks. >Sarah. I'm a bit surprised about programs which solve any sac in testsets, but they lose in games because of a sac. Note this is not the case with tiger, it's known to sacrafice pawns easily in the center (like the gs2930 is all about), it wins regurarly games because of this at icc. So very consequent behaviour. Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.