Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 00:05:56 09/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 22, 2000 at 02:54:36, Angrim wrote: >On September 20, 2000 at 18:54:19, Bruce Moreland wrote: > > >>I wonder how far I could get with 6 x 6 chess? Powers of 36 are quite a bit >>better than powers of 64. >> >>bruce > >for 6x6 chess, the 6 pieces tables should be practical to generate on my home >system, under 200meg per side for pawnless tables, and 600meg per side for >pawn tables. 7 piece tables should be a bit harder to do than the 6 piece >tables are for real chess, taking around 6gig per side for pawnless tables >and 18gig per side for tables with pawns. > >Anyone done tablebases for chinese chess yet? I was just looking at that >and it looks interesting. > >Angrim Ren Wu did a bunch but he doesn't post here anymore. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.