Author: Aaron Tay
Date: 10:37:31 09/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 22, 2000 at 12:04:39, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On September 22, 2000 at 09:48:49, Kim Roper Jensen wrote: > >>Hi All >> >>I saw the post about variable selectivity, and wondered. >> >>How about having a "turbulence" ( this comes from an article in the book >>Computer chess Compendium ) variable, >>Is this something thats tried ?? >>With regards Kim >That is actually backward from the way selectivity has to work to be effective. >If you have a large number of moves to choose from, if you don't toss many of >them, then your search will be way shallower than when you do. > >That is the catch-22 of selectivity in its many forms. The more you toss out, >the deeper you go, and the more you see, and the more you also miss. > >The less you toss out, the shallower you go, the less you see, and the less >you also miss. > >Which is better? :) Well it depends is a safe answer right?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.