Author: pavel
Date: 07:26:18 09/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 24, 2000 at 10:20:46, Harald Faber wrote: >On September 24, 2000 at 10:10:01, Eddie wrote: > >>Did you play Tiger/K7-500 against Shredder4/K6-200 ?? These are two completely >>different speeds of processor correct? What kind of results would you expect >>from such?!! The faster the computer, the better the results is all this >>means ........ > >Yes, Tiger had the Athlon-500 and 96MB hash while Shredder had the K6-200 with >24/8MB hash, g/120. As I said before, the first 7 games which Tiger played >wihtout the London-book, Shredder won by 4.5-2.5 (+4 =1 -2) on the slower >hardware! > so you agree, its the book that did the trick not the engine :) Pavel >Like it or not, a 5-0 is not very usual, even with this hardware difference. I >have played several games with Shredder on the slow machine and Shredder never >got crushed that high, not even against Tiger-12e.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.