Author: Harald Faber
Date: 07:36:23 09/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 24, 2000 at 10:26:18, pavel wrote: >On September 24, 2000 at 10:20:46, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On September 24, 2000 at 10:10:01, Eddie wrote: >> >>>Did you play Tiger/K7-500 against Shredder4/K6-200 ?? These are two completely >>>different speeds of processor correct? What kind of results would you expect >>>from such?!! The faster the computer, the better the results is all this >>>means ........ >> >>Yes, Tiger had the Athlon-500 and 96MB hash while Shredder had the K6-200 with >>24/8MB hash, g/120. As I said before, the first 7 games which Tiger played >>wihtout the London-book, Shredder won by 4.5-2.5 (+4 =1 -2) on the slower >>hardware! >> > >so you agree, its the book that did the trick not the engine :) > >Pavel > Only in a limited way, see my other post. Tiger did not win one game out of the book. Tiger is now out of book with positions Tiger is able to "understand" and win. I am sure that many other programs also would have lots of trouble with the small and unsound original book (AFAIK it is the LChess book), so no need to question Tigers performance and reduce it to book efforts.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.