Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:42:51 09/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 24, 2000 at 14:10:42, Eddie wrote: >On September 24, 2000 at 10:20:46, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On September 24, 2000 at 10:10:01, Eddie wrote: >> >>>Did you play Tiger/K7-500 against Shredder4/K6-200 ?? These are two completely >>>different speeds of processor correct? What kind of results would you expect >>>from such?!! The faster the computer, the better the results is all this >>>means ........ >> >>Yes, Tiger had the Athlon-500 and 96MB hash while Shredder had the K6-200 with >>24/8MB hash, g/120. As I said before, the first 7 games which Tiger played >>wihtout the London-book, Shredder won by 4.5-2.5 (+4 =1 -2) on the slower >>hardware! >> >>Like it or not, a 5-0 is not very usual, even with this hardware difference. I >>have played several games with Shredder on the slow machine and Shredder never >>got crushed that high, not even against Tiger-12e. > >Why don't you give Shredder the faster machine, and then come back and post some >more results!! :)) I don't like unfair results from unfair computer speeds! >Have a great day ..... :)) I have no problem with results from different computer speeds. If there is the same computer speed people can also complain that it is unfair to play with a good program against a bad program. I think that everything is fair if you tell the conditions that you play the games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.