Author: pavel
Date: 21:29:08 09/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 24, 2000 at 14:55:30, Christophe Theron wrote: >On September 24, 2000 at 14:42:51, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On September 24, 2000 at 14:10:42, Eddie wrote: >> >>>On September 24, 2000 at 10:20:46, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>>>On September 24, 2000 at 10:10:01, Eddie wrote: >>>> >>>>>Did you play Tiger/K7-500 against Shredder4/K6-200 ?? These are two completely >>>>>different speeds of processor correct? What kind of results would you expect >>>>>from such?!! The faster the computer, the better the results is all this >>>>>means ........ >>>> >>>>Yes, Tiger had the Athlon-500 and 96MB hash while Shredder had the K6-200 with >>>>24/8MB hash, g/120. As I said before, the first 7 games which Tiger played >>>>wihtout the London-book, Shredder won by 4.5-2.5 (+4 =1 -2) on the slower >>>>hardware! >>>> >>>>Like it or not, a 5-0 is not very usual, even with this hardware difference. I >>>>have played several games with Shredder on the slow machine and Shredder never >>>>got crushed that high, not even against Tiger-12e. >>> >>>Why don't you give Shredder the faster machine, and then come back and post some >>>more results!! :)) I don't like unfair results from unfair computer speeds! >>>Have a great day ..... :)) >> >>I have no problem with results from different computer speeds. >>If there is the same computer speed people can also complain that it is unfair >>to play with a good program against a bad program. >> >>I think that everything is fair if you tell the conditions that you play the >>games. >> >>Uri > > > >However I have suggested to Harald to exchange the computers and replay the >match. > > > > Christophe thats a very good suggestion i would say, but even better one is to reverse the opening too.....that is, if its possible.. Pavel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.