Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Even More Adaptive Null Move Pruning ?

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 10:53:21 09/25/00

Go up one level in this thread

On September 25, 2000 at 13:47:03, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>The "6" is pretty arbitrary.  I ran a lot of tests before choosing this
>number.  Ernst found the same number totally independently of me, although I
>think we did use some "common tests" (ie WAC, etc) without knowing what the
>other was doing.

Would it be acceptable to use R=4 with an even larger 'depth remaning'
threshold? Did you ever run tests with this configuration?

--
GCP

• Re: Even More Adaptive Null Move Pruning ? Robert Hyatt 19:22:30 09/25/00
• Re: Even More Adaptive Null Move Pruning ? Ernst A. Heinz 13:26:04 09/25/00
  • Re: Even More Adaptive Null Move Pruning ? Robert Hyatt 19:23:36 09/25/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.