Author: Roland Pfister
Date: 04:41:43 12/18/97
Go up one level in this thread
On December 13, 1997 at 18:17:49, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >I had a very similar idea a few months ago. As a result I have a >positional test of 24 problems, all from great grandmaster games and all >commented by grandmasters. I discarded positions with solutions not >found by any programs. The main difference with your proposal is that >instead of 30 minutes I used only 5, more or less the average amount of >time in games played at 40:2. > >The test has been posted on CCR under the name "CCR Test", with results >on a P200MMX/64. Below I post the global results of some programs and >the test set. Please tell me what you think of it. > >Rebel 8/9 17 >Hiarcs 6 16 >Mchess 6 16 >Rebel 6 16 >Mchess 7 15 >Fritz 5 13 >Genius 5 12 >Shredder 1 11 >Fritz 4 10 >CM5K 10 > >24 positions: snipped > >Enrique I had my program Patzer run this test with 27.5 minutes per position over night on a Sun Ultrastation 167 MHz: Pos. 1 Qa4 till 6:07 then changed to Ra1 ( does this count for 5 minutes :-) Pos. 2 9:05 Pos. 7 0:06 Pos.11 16:22 Pos.12 0:00 Pos.13 0:00 Pos.14 14:14 Pos.15 0:24 Pos.16 10:53 Pos.18 0:00 Pos.19 18:55 Pos.21 0:03 Position 1 shows that it is not enough to wait only 5 minutes. I am curious: Which positions were "solved" by which program in which time with which eval?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.