Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:15:29 09/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2000 at 07:02:06, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 26, 2000 at 06:46:18, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On September 26, 2000 at 03:52:12, pete wrote: >> >><snipped> >>>White(1): setboard r1b1r1k1/ppq2p1p/3b1ppQ/2n5/8/3B2N1/PPP2PPP/R1B2RK1 w - - >>> >>>16-> 2126:46 9.54 1. Nh5 Bxh2+ 2. Kh1 gxh5 3. Bxh7+ Kh8 >>> 4. Bg6+ Kg8 5. Qh7+ Kf8 6. Bh6+ Ke7 >>> 7. Qxf7+ Kd6 8. Qxe8 Qb6 9. Kxh2 Ne6 >>> 10. Bf5 Kc7 11. Qe7+ Bd7 12. Rad1 Rd8 >>> 13. Rxd7+ Rxd7 14. Bf4+ Kc8 15. Bxe6 >>>17 2298:46 ++ 1. Nh5!! >> >>Chessmaster6000(ss=10) >> >>evaluation 9.88 at depth 1/10 after 12:14 >>main line is similiar and the first different move is 9.Rfd1+ >> >>I hope that it can see mate at depth<16 in order to prove again that the depth >>is not important. >> >>Uri > >evaluation 10.62 at depth 11 > >first different move relative to crafty's line 10.Rfe1 >time 57:50 > >Uri evaluation 11.50 at depth 2/12 first different move 9.Qe3 time 3:35:06 I am not going to wait to see the evaluation at depth 3/13 The first 7 moves of black are forced(alternatives lead to short mates) so I think that it may be a better idea to start from the position after 8.Qxe8 if we want to try to prove a forced mate. Here black has some alternatives like 8...Bd7 or 8...Qd7 or 8...Qc6 or 8...Qa5 when seeing mate for white is not a simple problem for programs(they cannot see mate in a short time). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.