Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Killer Tiger 12.92 beta v Hiarcs 7.32 11 games 60/game autoplayed

Author: Terry Ripple

Date: 20:01:39 09/26/00

Go up one level in this thread


On September 26, 2000 at 04:47:36, Chessfun wrote:

>On September 26, 2000 at 04:16:22, Terry Ripple wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I have Hiarcs7.32 with the upgrade patch for it's book and Hiarc's will never
>>play 1.d4 d5 (2.Bg5) on its second move with white. I looked in hiarcs book and
>>observed that this move is there but the probability to play it is "0".
>
>
>Sorry but with normal book settings as loaded, the possibility is 1.1%.
>not 0. Plus in the specific game you refer to game 3 Hiarcs claims itself
>to be winning by 0.16 out of book.
>
>
>>Also, i noticed some of the games Hiarcs is coming out of the opening poorly,so
>>it must be its lousey book that is the blame for its poor play in those games!
>
>
>You didn't look close enough, Hiarcs comes out of book better in a majority of
>games.
>
>Here is what Hiarcs thinks of the 11 positions after book.
>
>      Score         Hiarcs    W/L
>[Annotator "-0.10"] White     Losing
>[Annotator "-0.20"] Black     Winning
>[Annotator "0.16"]  White     Winning
>[Annotator "-0.76"] Black     Winning big
>[Annotator "0.12"]  White     Winning
>[Annotator "0.19"]  Black     Losing
>[Annotator "-0.21"] White     Losing
>[Annotator "0.45"]  Black     Losing
>[Annotator "0.65"]  White     Winning Big
>[Annotator "-0.03"] Black     Winning
>[Annotator "0.41"]  White     Winning
>
>So we have Hiarcs +7 -4 most of these are minimal.
>The two biggest margins out of book more than +0.5 went
>to Hiarcs games 4 and 9 and Hiarcs lost 4 and drew 9.
>
>I see nothing here that indicates that Hiarcs lost due to book.
>
>
>>Then another point is that almost anything can happen in just a few games played
>
>If you read my original statement "Regardless of the time controls/number
>of games etc the score is very impressive". I agree anything can happen in a few
>games but in this case this is what happened.
>
>
>Thanks.
>Sarah.

 Hi Sarah,
I believe that you made a mistake on game 4 as Hiarcs lost BIG with -0.76 coming
out of the opening and Lost the game!

So my point was that it wasn't favorible coming out of the opening for Hiarcs
with a negative score because with white choosing the proper lines of play
should hardly ever come out of the opening with a negative score to start! And
even playing with black the score coming out of the opening should be only a
very small plus at must for White and certain lines of play should give black
equality with proper play.

And the second move 2.Bg5 you say is 1.1% is correct, i over looked this, sorry!

In game 1 Hiarcs came out of opening at -0.10 and Lost!
 "   "  4   "      "   "   "    "    "  -0.76  "  Lost Big Time!
 "   "  7   "      "   "   "    "    "  -0.21  "  Lost!

I don't mean to give you a hard time about this as this was not my intention at
all, but was just to give you a point of view. I appreciate all the great
testing that you perform and are kind enough to share with all of us here.
Please keep up the great testing and hope this clears things up. I also like to
run tests of the various engines because it is a fun thing to do and really
don't care if engine A beats engine B, but i like all the analysis that comes
from these games as it gives me some ideas to use in my own games against human
opponents.

Best regards,
Terry



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.