Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 09:02:24 09/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 2000 at 10:49:13, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 27, 2000 at 10:39:33, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: ><snipped> >>Which piece square tables? >>piece square tables won't help you much as they don't tell you the >>king is without protection at the other side of the board. >> >>Diep is evaluating this as +1.151 for black, it sees the mate in 1 in >>its qsearch however, so not even 1 ply needed to see mate in 1 here :) > >You are right that piece square tables do not tell that the king is without >protection but the point is that I believe that in most of the cases when the >king go to these squares it is without protection. > >I agree that it is better to see it by evaluation without piece square >tables(for example you can see that there are no pawn near the white king) but I >believe that if programs do not see it by better king safety evaluation then >they can at least use better piece square tables > >I saw that the position was the end of the main line of Yace and a better >evaluation could help Yace to avoid the mistake. > >Uri So you think yace isn't doing more as a piece square table evaluation? Programmer will be delighted hearing that i bet :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.