Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:17:31 09/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 2000 at 12:54:52, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On September 27, 2000 at 12:45:59, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On September 27, 2000 at 11:01:44, Hans Christian Lykke wrote: > >>Junior 6 is better than Nimzo 7.32 but it didn't score better than Nimzo 7.32 >>against the same opponent. <snipped> >I guess the answer is simple both Nimzo 7.32 and SOS are tactical monster and >when faced against Junior which is a very strategical program they are outplayed >by junior 6a, but when SOS is matched against Nimzo 7.32, since they are both >very good at tactics Nimzo simply get the advantage by having a better book than >SOS. I guess that it is not the reason. I do not think that SOS is better in tactics that Junior. I remember that SOS could not see a simple mate in the game against nimzo from WCCC when Junior has no problem to play better. It may be a statistical illusion and it is possible that if you play more games Junior will do better than nimzo. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.