Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:49:14 09/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 29, 2000 at 13:28:26, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 29, 2000 at 13:05:52, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>On September 27, 2000 at 17:31:40, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>Some of them have a highly polar ce, and I expect those are probably the easiest >>>to complete. >>> >>>Not deep enough yet: >>>[D] r1b2rk1/pp4p1/4pb1B/2P5/Pq2B3/1P6/2QP1P2/2KR2R1 w - - acd 14; acn >>>-2039212006; ce 1352; pv Rxg7+ Bxg7 Bh7+ Kh8 Bxg7+ Kxg7 Qg6+ Kh8 Qh5 Qa3+ Kc2 >>>Qxc5+ Qxc5 Bd7 Qd4+ Kxh7 Qxd7+ Kg6 Qxe6+ Kh5 Qe5+ Rf5 Qxf5+ Kh6 Rh1+ Kg7 Rh7+ >>>Kg8 Rxb7; pm Rxg7+; bm Rxg7; >> >>I have completed 16 plies on this one: >> >>16 1838:27 Mat15 1. Rxg7+ Bxg7 2. Bh7+ Kh8 3. Bxg7+ >> Kxg7 4. Qg6+ Kh8 5. Qh5 Qa3+ 6. Kc2 >> Qxc5+ 7. Qxc5 Bd7 8. Qd4+ Kxh7 9. Qxd7+ >> Kg6 10. Qxe6+ Kh5 11. Qe5+ Rf5 12. >> Qxf5+ Kh6 13. Rh1+ Kg7 14. Rh7+ Kg8 >> 15. Qf7# >> >>Sorry it's not in EPD, as you would like. But the answer is pretty interesting >>I think. :) I'm letting it search more now, to see if there's a shorter mate, >>but I don't think it'll find one. >> >>Jeremiah > >You used the wrong program. > >I think that chessmaster6000 analyzed this problem and found mate in 13 or mate >in 14 after some hours. > >I remember that I posted the main line some days ago. > >Uri It was more time ago but I found the exact post of mate in 14 Chessmaster6000 found it in less than 10 minutes and I do not remember the exact time. The number of plies was not 16 plies but smaller but it is not important look at http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?129981 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.