Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 16:25:20 09/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 29, 2000 at 12:14:25, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >[Event ""] >[Site "?"] >[Date "2000.09.23"] >[Round "00923GE4.PRT"] >[White "Chess Tiger"] >[Black "Genius5"] >[Result "1-0"] > >1. d4 c6 2. c4 d5 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Nc3 e6 5. e3 Nbd7 6. Bd3 Be7 7. O-O O-O >8. e4 dxe4 9. Nxe4 b6 10. b3 c5 11. Bb2 Bb7 12. Qe2 cxd4 13. Nxd4 Nc5 >14. Nxc5 Bxc5 15. Nf3 Rc8 16. Rad1 Qe7 17. Ne5 Ba3 18. Ba1 Rfd8 19. Qc2 Qc5 >20. g4 h6 21. h4 Qe7 22. g5 hxg5 23. hxg5 Ne4 24. f4 Nxg5 25. Kh2 Bd6 >26. Qe2 Nh7 27. Qh5 Nf6 28. Qh3 Qc7 29. Rg1 Qc5 30. Rdf1 Qa5 31. Rf2 Ra8 >32. Qh6 Bf8 33. Qxf6 Rd7 34. b4 Rc7 35. Qh6 Be4 36. Bxe4 g6 37. Qh8+ Kxh8 >38. Nxg6+ Kh7 39. Nxf8+ Kh6 40. Bg7+ Kh5 41. Bf3+ Kh4 42. Bf6+ Qg5 >43. Bxg5# 1-0 Hi! I really hopes this game is represantive for the new version. If Tiger should compete in the top it must play a lot more aggressive to take advantage of it's excellent tactical potential. I really like the program and the "programmer" but I have to admit it's play is sometimes very boring. I guess it is no coincidence that Tiger is the "draw-king" in my data-base of a few thousands games with Tiger. Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.