Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 10:25:52 10/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 2000 at 12:47:44, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 02, 2000 at 12:29:04, ERIQ wrote: > >>I just have to say wow I've played lots of programs but tiger seems very >>good. It didn't make any stupid computer moves that I could see and even >>seemed to make some waiting moves in a position that needed them. It didn't >>feel like a program at all, lots of knowlege of positional play. hardware >>used was 350 K6-2 128mb sdram. >> >>my game ended in a draw after 180+ moves and I was Very happy w/ it !!, as I had >>no chance at anytime to win as WHITE in a caro kahn. In the end I >>had a lone king, tiger had a Rook pawn and the wrong color bishop to win the >>game. > >It seems that tiger12 Dos did a typical computer error otherwise it could avoid >KBP vs K draw. > >I guess that it did not understand that it is a draw because it had no >tablebases and no knowledge about it(I guess that it is not going to work >against the new tiger because I remember that the author found a way to add this >kind of knowledge without being slower). > >Uri And the good thing is that just like rebel in future it most likely will not get EGTB soon either.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.