Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fritz5

Author: Bruce Moreland

Date: 20:54:21 12/19/97

Go up one level in this thread


This is a lot of posting to say that a program had a bad game, and a lot
of conclusions based upon this one bad game.

Every program has a bad game now and then, perhaps even often.  Mine
sure does.  I had a couple (maybe 3: MChess, Junior, and to a lesser
extent Nimzo) at the WMCCC that anyone is welcome to publish and berate
me about.  One even involved a misjudged passed pawn.

Most losses aren't very pretty.

Fritz got tangled up k-side in this game and mis-judged a q-side pawn.
It let its position get pretty ugly before that, too.

Mine would have mis-judged the pawn also, I'm not sure why.  I think the
problem is in the search, but it's also possible that more knowledge
about passed pawn "remoteness" could be a good thing.  It is hard to
judge passers right because they are either worth nothing or the win the
game, and the difference has a lot to do with specific circumstances
which are hard to evaluate statically.

I'm sure you have plenty of games where CS-Tal had a bad game.  I think
you can probably dig one up where it mis-judged a passed pawn, even.

bruce



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.