Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 10:38:53 10/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 2000 at 13:28:38, Christophe Theron wrote: >On October 02, 2000 at 12:47:44, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 02, 2000 at 12:29:04, ERIQ wrote: >> >>>I just have to say wow I've played lots of programs but tiger seems very >>>good. It didn't make any stupid computer moves that I could see and even >>>seemed to make some waiting moves in a position that needed them. It didn't >>>feel like a program at all, lots of knowlege of positional play. hardware >>>used was 350 K6-2 128mb sdram. >>> >>>my game ended in a draw after 180+ moves and I was Very happy w/ it !!, as I had >>>no chance at anytime to win as WHITE in a caro kahn. In the end I >>>had a lone king, tiger had a Rook pawn and the wrong color bishop to win the >>>game. >> >>It seems that tiger12 Dos did a typical computer error otherwise it could avoid >>KBP vs K draw. >> >>I guess that it did not understand that it is a draw because it had no >>tablebases and no knowledge about it(I guess that it is not going to work >>against the new tiger because I remember that the author found a way to add this >>kind of knowledge without being slower). >> >>Uri > > > >Tiger 12.0 DOS knows about the draw KBP/K endgame. > Amazing, i thought you wrote once that you wanted to solve chess just by search? > > Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.