Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 14:32:53 10/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 2000 at 12:51:26, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote: >On October 02, 2000 at 12:25:24, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On October 02, 2000 at 11:43:08, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On October 02, 2000 at 11:34:48, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On October 02, 2000 at 10:56:30, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>>><snipped> >>>>>As i have read in Stefan´s championship-report, marcus operated >>>>>tiger in the game tiger versus shredder in round 2. >>>>> >>>>>also i read that the operator (marcus ?!) told stefan, that he had prepared >>>>>this line against shredder4. Really only against shredder4 or also against >>>>>shredder4.16 ?! >>>> >>>> >>>>I do not know. >>>>I understood from stefan's post that the prepeperation was good against >>>>shredder4.16 >>>>I see that tiger lost the game so the preperation was not good against >>>>shredder(london) >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>However, I have to agree with Thorsten. If someone is _really_ a beta tester, >>>and they use information from beta testing to help an opponent, doesn't that >>>sound a bit unethical? >>> >>>If it happened, of course. >>It did not happen Bob. The choice to play the Belgrade was mine and >>mine alone. Marcus was just following orders as I was following orders >>of Jeroen. I have asked Stefan to take his untrue statement back. >> >>Ed >I got this impression from Marcus Kaestner himself during the game Tiger - >Shredder in London. If he was just showing off it is not my fault. Speaking about impressions: your statement gave the impression the Rebel-Shredder game was cooked because Marcus had leaked information doing unjustice to the game. Maybe you can check your impressions first before throwing such heavy stuff into public? I have email you know. Ed >Stefan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.