Author: Chessfun
Date: 12:54:10 10/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 2000 at 11:40:02, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 03, 2000 at 11:23:03, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On October 03, 2000 at 04:23:24, Terry Ripple wrote: >> >>>Using an AMD K6-2, 266 Mhz, Ponder off, Alternate colors, Up to 4 man tablebases >>> >>>Anyone interested to see the games i will be happy to post them in PGN. >>> >>>Regards, >>>Terry >>> >>> >>>Blitz: 25' 2000 >>> >>> 123456789012345678901234 >>>1 Hiarcs 7.32 110½½10½½½101½0001½1011½ 13.0/24 >>>2 Fritz 6 001½½01½½½010½1110½0100½ 11.0/24 >> >>Exactly! These results don't make Fritz 6 look that much stronger! >>That's why, after having waited at the beginning of the year to first see the >>results of the the new programs, I didn't buy any as I wasn't convinced enough >>of total improvements in playing results. > >The results of Fritz6a show that it is is stronger than the other commercial >programs(see the ssdf list). > >I am not sure if these results are results of Fritz6a because terry is known to >post results of Fritz6light. > >I was wrong in the past when I assumed that results of him are results of >Fritz6a when he said only Fritz6 and I am not going to do the same mistake >again. > >I assume that he means Fritz6light unless he says Fritz6a or Fritz6b. >Ecen if the results are of Fritz6a the number of games is not enough and the >results of the ssdf or the results of chessfun shows that Fritz6a is clearly >better than Hiarcs7.32. There is no doubt in my mind that Fritz6a is better than Hiarcs. In this case Terry I'm certain uses F6 Light but naturally for Hiarcs to win one set of blitz games is possible. Sarah. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.