Author: Chessfun
Date: 07:21:13 10/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2000 at 10:15:50, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 04, 2000 at 01:45:57, Chessfun wrote: > >>On October 04, 2000 at 00:35:34, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >> >>>On October 03, 2000 at 20:46:43, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>Err.. exactly _what_ program won't kick a GM at blitz? I have seen GNU do it. >>>>I have seen everybody else do it too... >>>> >>>>This is hardly a distinguishing event. >>> >>>Dr. Hyatt, >>> >>>You are correct. One game does not mean much. Gambit Tiger made it look so >>>easy though and Mecking made some decent moves. We will see how good this >>>program is within the next six months. >>> >>>The audience that will be buying these type of programs will be most amused by >>>the style of play of Gambit Tiger. I am certain that you would enjoy it too. >>> >>> >>>Tim Frohlick >> >> >>Sorry, but for me you both miss the point. >>The game is of interest not because this is a GM, >>but who this GM is. It would be of interest to me >>and others I'm sure regardless of the program or the result. >> >>Thanks. >>Sarah. > > >So that game is more interesting than watching Shirov get smashed over and over >on ICC? Personally for me...yes. Mecking IMO is equal to seeing games of Karpov or Kasparov against computers. While I don't disagree that most programs would smash GM's at these time controls.....there are some GM's that have a certain legend to them. Mecking is IMO one Shirov is not. Sarah.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.