Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:04:24 10/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2000 at 10:14:49, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 04, 2000 at 00:35:34, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: > >>On October 03, 2000 at 20:46:43, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>Err.. exactly _what_ program won't kick a GM at blitz? I have seen GNU do it. >>>I have seen everybody else do it too... >>> >>>This is hardly a distinguishing event. >> >>Dr. Hyatt, >> >>You are correct. One game does not mean much. Gambit Tiger made it look so >>easy though and Mecking made some decent moves. We will see how good this >>program is within the next six months. >> >>The audience that will be buying these type of programs will be most amused by >>the style of play of Gambit Tiger. I am certain that you would enjoy it too. >> >> >>Tim Frohlick > >My impression after watching hundreds of games between the new beta versions >and Crafty is that it is very solid, has filled a couple of horrible endgame >holes in the previous version, but I have not noticed any tendency to wildly >attack at all. At least against Crafty on ICC and chess.net. My understanding is that Gambit tiger and the default version are different. I understood that gambit tiger is weaker than the default version of tiger because the programmer had not enough time to work on tuning the evaluation and it is going to be an option for the users to give them impression about the next version of tiger. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.