Author: Peter Berger
Date: 13:20:56 10/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2000 at 14:16:43, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 04, 2000 at 14:09:27, Peter Berger wrote: ><snipped> >>While at blitz games the more traditional Tiger 12.95 BETA seems to be stronger >>at longer >>time controls the brand new and experimental "Gambit Tiger" BETA _really_ seems >>to kick ass :-) > >Do you suggest that gambit tiger is better than tiger12.95 Beta for the ssdf >games that are not blitz? > >Uri Yes , it seems I suggested that . But it is a risky kind of statement based on exactly two games : Mr Czub should appreciate this :) But this is not my field of interest : the eval compair in the 2nd game against Chessmaster is : I am really puzzled and impressed how I should judge this .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.