Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 13:28:22 10/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2000 at 10:21:13, Chessfun wrote: >On October 04, 2000 at 10:15:50, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On October 04, 2000 at 01:45:57, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On October 04, 2000 at 00:35:34, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >>> >>>>On October 03, 2000 at 20:46:43, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>Err.. exactly _what_ program won't kick a GM at blitz? I have seen GNU do it. >>>>>I have seen everybody else do it too... >>>>> >>>>>This is hardly a distinguishing event. >>>> >>>>Dr. Hyatt, >>>> >>>>You are correct. One game does not mean much. Gambit Tiger made it look so >>>>easy though and Mecking made some decent moves. We will see how good this >>>>program is within the next six months. >>>> >>>>The audience that will be buying these type of programs will be most amused by >>>>the style of play of Gambit Tiger. I am certain that you would enjoy it too. >>>> >>>> >>>>Tim Frohlick >>> >>> >>>Sorry, but for me you both miss the point. >>>The game is of interest not because this is a GM, >>>but who this GM is. It would be of interest to me >>>and others I'm sure regardless of the program or the result. >>> >>>Thanks. >>>Sarah. >> >> >>So that game is more interesting than watching Shirov get smashed over and over >>on ICC? > > >Personally for me...yes. >Mecking IMO is equal to seeing games of Karpov or Kasparov >against computers. While I don't disagree that most programs >would smash GM's at these time controls.....there are some GM's >that have a certain legend to them. Mecking is IMO one Shirov is not. > >Sarah. We have a difference of opinion then. I consider Shirov _far_ stronger against programs.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.