Author: Paul Byrne
Date: 20:40:43 10/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2000 at 19:01:25, Dann Corbit wrote: >On October 04, 2000 at 18:48:07, Joshua Lee wrote: > >>That are too weak to register a LCTII or BS score? > >WAC is pretty good. Every program will get some right (probably better than 50% >even for weak programs) and it is fairly well debugged. WAC is what I use the most -- it also has a decent number of positions, which is nice. At last check, it got 256/300 on WAC (at 2 minutes/position). Only 9/30 on BT-2630 (at 15 minutes/position) -- and I strongly suspect it chose the right move for the wrong reason on at least one of those. But that is on a very slow machine that costs it a couple of ply. That's my excuse. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.