Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:59:28 10/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2000 at 16:53:18, Albert Silver wrote: >On October 04, 2000 at 16:25:47, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On October 04, 2000 at 13:04:24, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On October 04, 2000 at 10:14:49, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On October 04, 2000 at 00:35:34, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 03, 2000 at 20:46:43, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Err.. exactly _what_ program won't kick a GM at blitz? I have seen GNU do it. >>>>>>I have seen everybody else do it too... >>>>>> >>>>>>This is hardly a distinguishing event. >>>>> >>>>>Dr. Hyatt, >>>>> >>>>>You are correct. One game does not mean much. Gambit Tiger made it look so >>>>>easy though and Mecking made some decent moves. We will see how good this >>>>>program is within the next six months. >>>>> >>>>>The audience that will be buying these type of programs will be most amused by >>>>>the style of play of Gambit Tiger. I am certain that you would enjoy it too. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Tim Frohlick >>>> >>>>My impression after watching hundreds of games between the new beta versions >>>>and Crafty is that it is very solid, has filled a couple of horrible endgame >>>>holes in the previous version, but I have not noticed any tendency to wildly >>>>attack at all. At least against Crafty on ICC and chess.net. >>> >>>My understanding is that Gambit tiger and the default version are different. >>> >>>I understood that gambit tiger is weaker than the default version of tiger >>>because the programmer had not enough time to work on tuning the evaluation and >>>it is going to be an option for the users to give them impression about the next >>>version of tiger. >>> >>>Uri >> >> >>OK... that was my misunderstanding then. I have simply been seeing games >>using the latest beta. If "gambit tiger" is a different program, I don't >>know whether I have seen that or not. > >I played Tiger 12.95 (and 12.92) against Crafty on ICC with the account >SubtleOne (I tried not to overdo it, though I was curious, however I got placed >on the NoPlay list all the same. Any chance you could take SubtleOne off? I'd >like to try a couple of standards with Gambit 0.95 (it IS a different engine). > > Albert No problem. why did you get noplayed? I didn't notice. But I assume you are not running crafty? which probably means > 4 games?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.